A core bond portfolio, also referred to as “core income,” has been a staple of portfolio allocations for decades. Historically, these core income strategies utilized U.S. Treasuries and investment grade bonds, prioritized income over capital return, and had lower risk and inverse correlation to equities.
When global yields were higher, these strategies made more sense. But since 1998, corporate bond yields have dropped from 6.51% to a recent rate of 2.81%1 To counter falling yields, investment managers developed a “core plus” strategy – one that incorporates bank loans and high yield bonds that trade on exchanges.
Traditional Core Plus Strategy
The Attributes Have Eroded as Markets Have Altered
While a core plus strategy may increase yield, if the percentage of high yield bonds is not carefully managed, it can also increase the risk of a portfolio substantially. The standard deviation of high yield bonds is often much higher than their investment grade counterparts because the risk of default is considerably higher.
Because high yield bonds have historically had a relatively high correlation to equities, they do not offer a strong non-correlation advantage. Indeed, even the investment grade bond market has begun to move similarly to equities over time, eroding the diversification benefit of holding a core or core plus strategy.
Setting a fixed allocation to high yield bonds and maintaining that percentage over time can create a portfolio in which the level of risk is disproportionate to the return potential. A better strategy is to dynamically allocate to high yield bonds when market conditions create opportunity, a strategy employed by institutional investors.
A Potential Solution – The New Core Income
The credit spectrum has expanded greatly in the last two decades, as structural changes in banking and lending have become well established. New sources of income have become more prevalent, along with innovative structures.
These strategies incorporate a broad global spectrum. They may include liquid credit investments such as high yield bonds and leveraged loans as well as private credit direct lending assets, which do not trade on exchanges and are illiquid. They may also tactically invest in alternative income assets, such as private asset-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations.
The New Core Income
The new core income is also a total return strategy. It seeks interest income and capital gains. Maximizing both price appreciation and current income is central to the investment philosophy. At the same time, because the strategy can hold assets that are not publicly traded it may offer lower volatility than public markets and may reduce the correlation between equity and traditional bond holdings.
In addition, there’s an income element that strategies holding purely liquid investments may not offer. It’s the illiquidity premium associated with holding investments long term that do not trade on exchanges. That’s the kicker.
Traditional Core vs New Core Income Total Return
Income Through Relative Value Investing
Strategies that invest across the universe of non-investment grade, in both liquid and illiquid securities, have the ability to seek out relative value wherever it can be found, and to make tactical moves at opportune times. These could be defensive plays or offensive plays during market dislocations, as we are seeing now.
Private Credit Creates a Different Risk Profile
In illiquid markets, the sea-change began after 2008, when regulations regarding banking changed drastically, leading to banks exiting their traditional role as lenders to all. Banks now are increasingly just lenders to the largest companies. This has created a market opportunity for asset managers with the ability to perform intensive research in both companies and markets, and then to commit their own capital for long-term investments.
Because these loans are at the top of the company’s capital structure – called senior secured loans – they have recourse to the underlying assets of the company and have seniority over other creditor claims. The historical recovery rate for these types of securities is 81% – much higher than most other types of higher-yielding debt.2
Where are we now?
Changes in markets driven by previous global financial crises have resulted in an expanded credit spectrum. Investment portfolios can now access a broad range of assets, which can potentially help meet portfolio goals.
As with any asset class, there are certain risks associated with non-investment grade debt. Credit risk is the risk of nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal payments on a debt investment. The risk of default may be greater. Should a borrower fail to make a payment, or default, this may affect the overall return to the lender. Further, illiquid investments require longer investment time horizons than other investments. For these and other reasons, this asset class is considered speculative and may not be suitable for everyone.